Ethics in the life sciences: debating neuro-enhancement

Ciência Viva and IBMC final NERRI event took place 25 February at Pavilhão do Conhecimento, Lisbon. 25 students from Cidadela high school, in Cascais, spent an afternoon discussing neuro-enhancement and preparing questions to ask in a multidisciplinary public debate on the ethics of neuro-enhancement.

The workshop started with briefs by Teresa Summavielle (IBMC-i3S, Porto), on the biomedical aspects of neuro-enhancement, and by Sheena Laursen and Peter Eduard (Experimentarium, Copenhagen), who shared the results of their mutual learning exercises with Danish high school students.

The students were then confronted with props – mock drugs and electronic devices used for cognitive improvement, herbal teas, smart drinks and nutritional supplements, gym equipment, bed pillows and vouchers for mindfulness mediation – with basic information about their neuro-enhancement potential, warnings, possible side effects and limitations. Each student picked up one item and discussed it in small groups, leading to a group statement and question about neuro-enhancement. The issues and questions thus raised were discussed in a plenary session; some of them were selected to be video recorded for the debate at night.

 

 P1030505

The students came up with the following questions:

  • Will neuro-enhancement just improve us, or will it give rise to different versions of ourselves?
  • If there are anti-doping committees in sports, should there also be anti-doping committees in any intellectual activity of competitive nature (e.g., school, exams)?
  • What happens to meritocracy in a society where the brain can be enhanced? Does NE change the nature of personal worth?
  • Should NE be made public, i.e., available for everyone? What requirements or qualifications should one fulfil to be able to use NE?
  • Should there be some sort of public database or catalogue of NE users?

 

P1030534

 

Later in the day, Ciência Viva and the National Commission for Ethics of the Life Sciences organized a debate on the ethics of neuro-enhancement, with presentations by a philosopher, a psychiatrist and a neuroscientist, and the video with the questions was used to start the 1h30 discussion with the public. The session is available here (in Portuguese).